National

A person should be judged by his character and style of working, and not by the religion: Swaraj

NEW DELHI: On Saturday terming the proposed Communal Violence Bill as “dangerous”, the BJP opposed the legislation at the National Integration Council meeting here, saying it presumes that the majority community is always responsible for such riots.

Leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj told reporters, “We feel that the Communal Violence Bill is a dangerous Bill as it harms the federal structure of the Constitution. It allows the Centre to hold all the powers. Moreover, it does not consider anybody a citizen and treats a person only as one belonging to either a majority or a minority.”

Her Rajya Sabha counterpart Arun Jaitley and chief ministers of three BJP-ruled states, Ramesh Pokhriyal Nishank (Uttarakhand), Sadanand Gowda (Karnataka) and Raman Singh (Chhattisgarh) — echoed these sentiments at the NIC meeting.

The BJP made it clear that the Bill in its present form, which has been drafted by UPA Chairperson Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council, should not come to Parliament.

Swaraj said, “You will write off a person as a criminal, just because he or she is born in a majority community and you will presume that a person would be a victim only because you are born in a minority community. This bill is very dangerous.”

The main opposition insisted that if passed, this legislation will encourage communal tension instead of reducing it, as it seeks to divide the country into majority and minority communities.

The BJP also argued at the NIC meeting that a discussion on communal violence at this juncture was not at all relevant as there have been no instances of such acts in the recent past.

“There have been two major terror incidents in Mumbai and Delhi recently. The incidents of naxal attacks are also on the rise. Therefore, today’s agenda is not relevant as there has been no incident of communal violence in the country in the recent past. A discussion on naxalism and terrorism would have been more productive,” said Sushma Swaraj.

Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker
spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto spbutoto